Charities & the Third Sector

Governance that supports mission, impact, and public trust.

Charities, voluntary organisations, and social enterprises exist to make a difference. Behind every third sector organisation — however large or small, however local or national — is a mission that matters: to improve lives, strengthen communities, protect the vulnerable, advance knowledge, preserve culture, or address injustice. Good governance is what gives these organisations the foundation to pursue that mission effectively, sustainably, and with the trust and confidence of the people they serve and the public that supports them.

Trustees, board members, and committee volunteers are the custodians of that mission. They carry ultimate legal and strategic responsibility for their organisation — for its direction, its resources, its culture, and its integrity. It is one of the most important roles in civil society, and one that deserves to be taken seriously and supported well. The best boards are genuinely transformative — bringing the clarity of purpose, quality of oversight, and depth of commitment that allows third sector organisations to achieve far more than they could without strong governance behind them.

The organisations that invest in their governance — that build boards with the right skills and diversity, that reflect honestly on how well they are functioning, and that continually strengthen the way they are led — are the ones best placed to maximise their impact, attract funding, and sustain the trust that is the lifeblood of the sector.

Trustees, directors, and committee members give their time, expertise, and energy in service of causes they believe in. Supporting them to govern well — with clarity, confidence, and the right frameworks in place — is one of the most valuable investments a third sector organisation can make.

The Landscape — A Sector of Enormous Breadth and Vital Importance

The third sector is one of the most diverse and dynamic parts of civil society. It encompasses registered charities, voluntary and community organisations, social enterprises, and community interest companies — ranging from small neighbourhood groups run entirely by volunteers to major national institutions with hundreds of staff, complex programme portfolios, and turnovers running into tens or hundreds of millions of pounds. What unites them is a commitment to social purpose and a governance responsibility that sits with the people who lead them.

Registered charities — of which there are over 170,000 in England and Wales — form the core of the sector. They range from small community organisations where trustees are deeply committed but may have had little formal governance support, to large and complex institutions where the demands on the board are considerable and the stakes are high. Wherever a charity sits on that spectrum, clear and effective governance is what gives it the platform to pursue its purposes with confidence and integrity.

Voluntary and community organisations — including those that operate below the registration threshold or choose not to register as charities — are the often invisible engine of community life. Many are run by small committees of dedicated volunteers, operating without paid staff and with limited governance infrastructure. For these organisations, proportionate and practical governance support can be genuinely transformative — providing the structure and confidence that allows committed people to do more, more effectively, and more sustainably.

Social enterprises occupy a distinctive and growing space in the third sector landscape. Whether structured as community interest companies, charitable incorporated organisations, companies limited by guarantee, or other forms, they combine a social mission with trading activity — generating income from products and services in pursuit of social or environmental goals. The governance of a social enterprise must support both commercial effectiveness and social accountability, balancing the disciplines of business with an unwavering commitment to purpose. For social enterprise boards, navigating that balance — and demonstrating it clearly to funders, commissioners, and partners — is one of the central governance challenges.

Community Interest Companies are a particularly common vehicle for social enterprise activity, offering a flexible structure with a built-in asset lock and community benefit requirement. CIC directors carry governance responsibilities that blend elements of company law with the expectations of a mission-driven organisation, and boards benefit from governance support that understands both dimensions.

Across all of these settings, the sector faces a shared context of rising expectations — from regulators, from funders, from commissioners, and from the communities these organisations exist to serve. Boards and committees that are well-supported and well-governed are significantly better placed to meet those expectations and to deliver the impact their organisations were created to achieve.

The Regulatory Framework — The Charity Commission, the Charities Act, Companies House, and the Code of Good Governance

The governance of third sector organisations is shaped by a varied regulatory landscape that differs depending on the legal structure and activities of the organisation involved. Understanding that landscape — and operating confidently within it — is a core responsibility for anyone in a governance role in the sector.

For registered charities, the Charity Commission is both regulator and registrar, responsible for ensuring that charities operate in accordance with their purposes and in the public interest. It sets out the legal duties of trustees clearly — covering the duty of compliance, the duty of prudence, and the duty of care — and provides guidance across a wide range of governance topics, from conflicts of interest and financial controls to serious incident reporting and decision-making. The Commission's regulatory approach has become increasingly active in recent years, with a greater willingness to intervene where governance failures are identified and a clearer expectation that trustees will take their responsibilities seriously and proactively.

The Charities (Protection and Social Investment) Act 2016 strengthened the Commission's powers further, including enhanced ability to act against misconduct and mismanagement. Trustees who are not across their legal responsibilities — or who allow poor governance to go unaddressed — carry personal as well as organisational risk.

For social enterprises and CICs structured as companies, Companies House oversight and the duties set out in the Companies Act 2006 provide an additional layer of legal responsibility — with directors subject to statutory obligations around filing, financial reporting, and the conduct of company affairs. For CICs specifically, the CIC Regulator oversees compliance with the community interest and asset lock requirements that define the structure, and the annual community interest report provides a mechanism for public accountability.

Voluntary and community organisations that are not formally incorporated or registered carry fewer statutory obligations — but they are not without governance responsibilities. Where they hold public funding, employ staff, or work with vulnerable people, the expectations of funders, commissioners, and safeguarding frameworks apply regardless of legal form, and sound governance is just as important as in any registered body.

The Charity Governance Code — the sector's leading voluntary framework for governance best practice — sets out principles and recommended practice across seven areas: organisational purpose, leadership, integrity, decision-making, diversity and inclusion, openness and accountability, and the board's relationship with staff and volunteers. Applicable to charities and widely relevant to other third sector organisations, it is the benchmark against which governance quality is increasingly assessed by funders, regulators, and partners alike.

The governance expectations placed on third sector organisations will continue to evolve. The most forward-thinking boards are those that see good governance not as a regulatory obligation but as a genuine expression of their commitment to their mission and to the people they serve.

What Our Governance Reviews Look Like for Charities and Third Sector Organisations

Our governance reviews are designed to give boards, trustee bodies, and management committees an honest, independent, and constructive assessment of how effectively they are operating — and a clear roadmap for building on their strengths and addressing any areas for development.

We work with organisations of all sizes and types across the third sector — from small voluntary groups taking their first steps towards more structured governance, to large and complex charities and social enterprises with professional executive teams, trading subsidiaries, and significant public profiles. We tailor our approach to the specific legal structure, stage of development, and needs of each organisation, and we bring a genuine understanding of the third sector and the pressures that those in governance roles face to every review we undertake.

Our reviews are not about finding fault or generating compliance paperwork. They are a genuine and supportive conversation about how the board or committee is working — designed to give those in governance roles the clarity and confidence to lead well and to make the most of the remarkable work their organisations do.

Our reviews typically cover:

  • Board and committee composition, skills and diversity — whether the governing body has the right mix of skills, experience, and perspectives to govern effectively, including assessment against the Charity Governance Code where applicable, and whether members are properly recruited, inducted, and supported throughout their time in the role

  • Roles, responsibilities and delegation — clarity of accountabilities between the board or committee, any sub-committees, and the executive or staff team, and how well the organisation manages the important boundary between governance and operational management

  • Strategic oversight and challenge — how effectively the board sets and monitors the organisation's strategy and objectives, holds the executive or staff team to account, and maintains meaningful oversight of impact, financial health, and risk

  • Compliance with applicable legal and regulatory frameworks — a clear and practical assessment of where the organisation stands against its obligations under charity law, company law, or other applicable frameworks, and support for addressing any gaps in a proportionate and manageable way

  • Financial governance and stewardship — the board's oversight of financial health, reserves, controls, and long-term sustainability, and whether those in governance roles have the financial understanding and assurance they need to discharge their duties with confidence

  • Conflicts of interest and integrity — the robustness of the organisation's approach to identifying and managing conflicts of interest, and whether its governance culture reflects the values and ethical standards the organisation espouses

  • Mission, impact and beneficiary accountability — how effectively the board maintains focus on the people and communities the organisation exists to serve, and whether governance structures give appropriate weight to the voice and experience of beneficiaries, members, and the wider community

  • Board and committee culture, dynamics and effectiveness — how the governing body works together, the quality of debate and decision-making, the effectiveness of the chair, and whether the culture supports openness, mutual respect, and a shared commitment to the organisation's mission and values

  • Governance infrastructure — the quality of governance administration, including meeting papers, minutes, governing documents, and the support available to board and committee members

Following every review, we provide a detailed written report with clear, prioritised recommendations — and we remain available to support implementation, not just deliver findings.

Let’s Work Together